An argument against the legalization of drugs in the us

Many countries have the drug problem they deserve. Therefore, drugs should not be legalized. The philosophic argument is that, in a free society, adults should be permitted to do whatever they please, always provided that they are prepared to take the consequences of their own choices and that they cause no direct harm to others.

But clearly, opiate addicts who receive their drugs legally and free of charge continue to commit large numbers of crimes. A marijuana withdrawal syndrome occurs, consisting of anxiety, depression, sleep and appetite disturbances, irritability, tremors, diaphoresis, nausea, muscle convulsions, and restlessness.

LSD has been widely researched as a therapeutic agent, and has shown effectiveness against alcoholismfrigidity and various other disorders. Moreover, when the police in our city do catch an addict, they are less likely to prosecute him if he can prove that he is undergoing anything remotely resembling psychiatric treatment.

Crime, violence and drug use go hand in hand. So long as there are addicts who have to resort to the black market for their drugs, there will be drug-associated crime.

Youngsters are no longer criminalized for trying something that they would try anyway. Finally, and not the least of the evils associated with repression, the helpless addict has been forced to resort to crime in order to get money for the drug which is absolutely indispensable for his comfortable existence.

Within Bolivia, the political rise of current president Evo Morales is directly related to his grassroots movement against US-sponsored coca-eradication and criminalization policies.

Alcoholic beverages are clearly marked with the amount of alcohol. I suppose, though, if drugs were to be legalised then just as likely would be the creation of powerful interest lobbies. This view holds that it should be easy for addicts to receive opiate drugs from doctors, either free or at cost, and that they should receive them in municipal injecting rooms, such as now exist in Zurich.

I once worked as a doctor on a British government aid project to Africa. Agricultural producers in these countries are pushed further to grow coca for the cocaine trade by the dumping of subsidised farming products fruit, vegetables, grain etc.

Commentary Magazine

And no one should underestimate the possibility that the use of stimulant drugs could spread very much wider, and become far more general, than it is now, if restraints on their use were relaxed. Douglas Husak questions the justification for punishing persons who use drugs such as marijuana, heroin, and cocaine.

Drug prohibitionists must face the problem that any "health risk" argument used to distinguish illicit drugs and subject offenders to prison sentences runs up against the known, yet tolerated, health risks of tobacco, as well as the additional health risks associated with incarceration.

The importation of the mildly stimulant khat is legal in Britain, and a large proportion of the community of Somali refugees there devotes its entire life to chewing the leaves that contain the stimulant, miring these refugees in far worse poverty than they would otherwise experience.

Increased violent crime and increased numbers of criminals will result in even larger prison populations. Marijuana Tea — A great way to consume your greens in a lovely drink. Legalizing drugs will send a message to children that drug use is acceptable.

The United States and many countries would be in violation of international treaty if they created a legal market in cocaine, marijuana, and other drugs.

But does putting drug users in prison contribute to this worthy goal? As drug abuse causes more job related accidents, more people will be hurt or killed. Many banned drugs are significantly less deleterious to free will than legal alcohol or tobacco. Criminalizing the everyday user does not make society a good place.

Gil Kerlikowskecurrent director of the US ONDCPargues that legalizing drugs, then regulating and taxing their sale, would not be effective fiscally.Inthe President appointed me chairman of the National Advisory Council for Drug Abuse Prevention. Created by Congress, the Council was charged with providing.

Another key argument against legalization ties into regulating the drug. As an example, the U.S. has a well-defined line in the sand when it comes to driving under the influence of alcohol. If you're under a blood-alcohol content (BAC) of %, you may or may not be arrested for driving impaired.

The Case for Legalizing Drugs

The arguments in favor of legalizing the use of all narcotic and stimulant drugs are twofold: philosophical and pragmatic. Neither argument is negligible, but both are mistaken, I believe, and both miss the point.

Against Legalizing Drug Production and Distribution. Peter de Marneffe offers an argument against drug legalization. The argument itself is simple. If drugs are legalized, there will be more drug abuse.

If there is more drug abuse that is bad. Drug abuse is sufficiently bad to justify making drug production and distribution illegal. Nov 07,  · The Argument against Drug Prohibition - The failure of prohibition to prevent consumption of illicit drugs shows that existing policies do not work.

It would be preferable to use the money saved by ending prohibition to provide more drug rehabilitation centres and more drug mint-body.coms: 3. History shows us that making drugs illegal creates criminal enterprises, and prohibition exacerbates the very real dangers of impurity, violence, and poverty.

Education and harm reduction strategies are much more effective ways to reduce the dangers of drugs .

An argument against the legalization of drugs in the us
Rated 4/5 based on 16 review